Write it on what? It's a brand new board set. No machine has ever used it, ever used an LCD screen, has ever used this many RGB LEDs. They needed to wait until the table was functional to test software as they go. Pointless putting 6 months into code to find it doesn't work on day 1 you test it
Hmmmm. So Stern release a game without what people consider 100% completed code and follow it up with updates...and that is considered not fully working .....but yet JJ releases a game without 100% completed finished code, to be followed up with updates ...and thats considered fully working !?! Yeah whatever ......:rolleyez: Pretty dumb to try and spin that one.
This kind of petty sniping at each other does neither JJ or GS any favours.
Everyone is allowed an opinion, including me
They must know the specs of the hardware, they should have had a clear understanding of what the logic would be. They could have developed the lot in parallel, then tested at the end. I'd be very surprised if there are not applications which could be used to simulate it anyway.
Yeah, exactly. From what I've seen of the innards it looks like a mini-atx pc inside, most likely running linux. It would not be a problem to simulate the inputs from the targets/rollovers etc and program lights and the game before the boards were made. This is common practice with software development.
I doubt the guy has been 'twiddling his thumbs' for two years but the coding could definitely have started earlier and been ready for the scheduled release date.
Everything on maximum then tape it all down and leave it :rockon:
Keith has until March 13th to have a functional version of the software
Any news? Did he meet his target? I'm presuming the lack of posts here would imply either a) he didn't, b) people don't know and Jack hasn't said anything to the buyers on their group, or c) the flying monkeys have kidnapped Keith and are holding him in the Witch's castle until the code is complete...