Perhaps they are the ones wanting to avoid the relentless moaning and attacks by the same small band of troublemakers that really should be banned?I hear lots of pinsiders now on rgp.
Perhaps they are the ones wanting to avoid the relentless moaning and attacks by the same small band of troublemakers that really should be banned?I hear lots of pinsiders now on rgp.
What is rgp?I hear lots of pinsiders now on rgp.
Yep, looks terrible. Pinside has its faults but I find it easy just to ignore the negative posters.It’s usenet when we all had dial up modems lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Pinside "faults" could be fixed overnight by effective moderating IMO. This is something that Robin (the site owner) seems very reluctant to implement despite several people that I am aware of asking him to do so. His site, his rules I guess.Yep, looks terrible. Pinside has its faults but I find it easy just to ignore the negative posters.
RGP = rec.games.pinball
It's the predecessor to Pinside
Controversy breeds interest.Pinside "faults" could be fixed overnight by effective moderating IMO. This is something that Robin (the site owner) seems very reluctant to implement despite several people that I am aware of asking him to do so. His site, his rules I guess.
But one person's opinion post is another person's offensive post.
My beef is they allow posters to make not just inflammatory posts but direct personal attacks on people and companies or things....pretty well whatever is the flavour of the month ripe for attack! It just isn't necessary IMO. Some of the posts are outright slander or defamatory but posters are allowed to keep on saying pretty much anything they like.I think they get most of it right in pinside from a moderating POV. But one person's opinion post is another person's offensive post. I think when folks are on the attack the pinside folks step in, probably more than any other forum I'm part of.
A lot of suppliers are frustrated because they don't like that people can have an opinion on pinside but that's not really pinside's problem.
First, I'm not a lawyer of any type - these comments are only my understanding and not based on any legal knowledge. They also apply to many comments I have seen on Pinside that are not directed or involve me in any way.if they are slander or defamatory hit pinside with a C&D.
Do you mean "kooks" or cooks (as written) as in people who prepare food?there are some cooks on pinside / like every forum too add them to ignore and drain the stupid threads and pinside is epic.
I'm guessing he means cocks!Do you mean "kooks" or cooks (as written) as in people who prepare food?
Sorry but _everything_ on that deeproot thread is warranted, and I don’t see a single case of slander or defamation - the simple fact that Robert hasn’t done a C&D demonstrates that fact because if anyone was going to do a C&D it would be him - but he doesn’t have a leg to stand on.
Robert promised the world and has pretty much broken every single promise and has not been transparent until he was forced to do so. He deserves every single bit of **** and more