D
Deleted member 2463
I'll invite the local school round to the next event, that'll be the same as beating 100 players at The UK Open.
utter nonsense - the event has to be open to any attendees so there is more chance of millwall winning the EPL than this happening.
Or winning a comp with only 20 people would award the same pts as winning a comp with 100 people.
so for every event I’m going to get 20 random people off the street to play.
a win is a win. you have beaten the other players. so far none of the UKCS events have had less than 30 people.
I can go on.
you need to because those reasons above don‘t stand up to scrutiny.
To qualify for the finals held at Daventry, you need to have competed around the country first - it is not a stand alone event at Pinfest.
it should be counted in the same way.
I can think of numerous ways the system can be abused if the IFPA average wasn't used.
there are always way to abuse any system.
of course they should! the clue is in the more events! so our 4 days of 20 rounds of matchplay at PBR for the monster meet is going to weigh heavily! we might do finals the next day for each of them make them certified and boom!Many different formats were ran through with the numbers from previous years - without fail the weekends with multiple events had more influence on results than anything else.
As Greg said, half of the people who would have made the final last year if we had used every event would only have competed over a single weekend - noone who didn't play at The UK Open would have made the finals - not exactly a true representation of a SERIES comprising at least 35 events (the number Greg went to)
if you do count back that issue is moot.
The other thing to note is the vast majority of formats came up with 17/18 of the same final qualifiers.