- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Messages
- 161
Phil Dixon' date=' post: 1678471 said:I think it's competitions gone mad, way too many.
There's only 1 major event per day (and the team event is just for fun), plus the League finals. I'm not sure that's "way too many". ;-)
We build it, and they come!
Phil Dixon' date=' post: 1678471 said:3) Only put machines in the open that are duplicated out on the floor
Several machines only get brought to the show if they're used in tournaments. The owners don't want them on general use. Getting hold of machines in the first place for tournaments, let alone duplicates, is hard enough.
Phil Dixon' date=' post: 1678471 said:5) Ditch the stupid "buy your finals place" Classic and make it a proper compo
It's a good point, the Classics grew out of the old Hi-Score competition, which in itself was superceeded by a "proper compo" i.e. the Open. I know what you mean about buying your way into the finals, which is what happens in many of the "Open" tournaments in the USA. I don't like that. Trouble is, a proper compo would have all the same players in the final as the Open anyway, I don't think that happens in the Classics the way it is now, so there are advantages. However, it's good to hear people's views either way.
Phil Dixon' date=' post: 1678471 said:Oh, whilst we are at it, the league final should be of the games: 2EM, 2SS, 2DM. They should be drawn at random from the available pool of machines.
I'd buy that for a dollar. If you said that to some of the Europeans, they'd look at you as if you'd gone mad. Some of them think it should be dot-matrix only, which I think is a real shame. Trouble is, though, getting tournament-reliable EMs is not that easy.