Tulips 2.0
How anyone can talk about cryptocurrencies, particularly BTC, as viable currencies when the general advice seems to be to "hold on and ride out the latest massive slump" on a regular basis is beyond me. Fiat currency is not an investment, it's... a currency.
There is little evidence to suggest cryptocurrencies are making any headway into actually becoming viable alternatives to fiat, quite the contrary many entities are finding themselves forced to back out of accepting it due to its crippling transaction fees and ridiculous volatility. In fact, all the attention right now is on these things as investment vehicles, which is the antithesis of what a currency is.
When you strip away its value as a currency - i.e. something that actually flows - you're basically left with Emperor's New Clothes, a load of people in an echo chamber who subscribe to Confirmation Bias Monthly agreeing that something is valuable because, well, it just is. It's not even a "store of value" when you're talking huge volatility over the span of several hours.
A Guardian article I read said it best - cryptocurrencies right now are like a cure for cancer where the recipe is open sourced, with BTC being one trademarked brand. What value does CancerCure™ have when there will be another 100 different brand names all delivering the same benefit tomorrow? Right now the hype seems to be purely based on the notion that "cryptocurrencies are the future", which feels precipitous at best. Cryptocurrencies as a concept might survive, and in the short term there will be people who make money on BTC and the like - fuelling the gold rush, but there will be vastly more people who lose their shirt believing it to be an bonafide "get rich scheme" for woke folks only that has miraculously passed all the old school investor brigade by.
Hope no one here is overexposed, and no offence intended to anyone
How anyone can talk about cryptocurrencies, particularly BTC, as viable currencies when the general advice seems to be to "hold on and ride out the latest massive slump" on a regular basis is beyond me. Fiat currency is not an investment, it's... a currency.
There is little evidence to suggest cryptocurrencies are making any headway into actually becoming viable alternatives to fiat, quite the contrary many entities are finding themselves forced to back out of accepting it due to its crippling transaction fees and ridiculous volatility. In fact, all the attention right now is on these things as investment vehicles, which is the antithesis of what a currency is.
When you strip away its value as a currency - i.e. something that actually flows - you're basically left with Emperor's New Clothes, a load of people in an echo chamber who subscribe to Confirmation Bias Monthly agreeing that something is valuable because, well, it just is. It's not even a "store of value" when you're talking huge volatility over the span of several hours.
A Guardian article I read said it best - cryptocurrencies right now are like a cure for cancer where the recipe is open sourced, with BTC being one trademarked brand. What value does CancerCure™ have when there will be another 100 different brand names all delivering the same benefit tomorrow? Right now the hype seems to be purely based on the notion that "cryptocurrencies are the future", which feels precipitous at best. Cryptocurrencies as a concept might survive, and in the short term there will be people who make money on BTC and the like - fuelling the gold rush, but there will be vastly more people who lose their shirt believing it to be an bonafide "get rich scheme" for woke folks only that has miraculously passed all the old school investor brigade by.
Hope no one here is overexposed, and no offence intended to anyone
Last edited: